How Small Brands
Win Big
In late 2024, Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) acquired Minimalist, a four-year-old skincare startup, at a valuation nearly ten times its revenue.
On paper, this seems almost illogical. Why would a giant like HUL, with decades of resources and R&D capability, and the credibility of legendary brands like Dove, Vaseline and Ponds, choose to buy rather than build? The answer reveals something profound about the changing nature of modern branding.
We’re living through a marketing revolution, one where the biggest brands aren’t always the strongest, and where intimacy now scales better than ubiquity.
For decades, the foundational principles of brand building were defined by mass reach, economies of scale, and broadcasted messaging. The goal was to speak to everyone - loudly, consistently, and at scale. But today, those rules are crumbling. The most resilient brands are not necessarily the largest, but the most human.
A new age of microbrand has emerged, powered by digital technology and direct-to-consumer (D2C) models. These are agile, niche-focused entities that serve specific “tribes” of consumers through a potent mix of authenticity, community, and emotional connection.
In a way, microbrands are the digital e-kiranas of our time. Intimate, trusted, and community-centric. They succeed not by shouting the loudest, but by listening the closest.
This article traces how we arrived here, from the personalized loyalty of the corner kirana store, through the impersonal supermarket era, to the hyper-connected digital age. It examines why emotional connection has become the ultimate currency in modern marketing.
Microbrands: These are small-scale, often digital-native D2C brands that cater to a highly specific niche audience or "tribe". They are defined by a strong point of view, an authentic founder story, and a deep, community-focused relationship with their customers. Think of brands like Mokobara (travel lifestyle), The Whole Truth (clean-label foods), or Minimalist (transparent skincare).
Emotional Branding: This is the practice of building a brand by creating an emotional connection with consumers, rather than a purely transactional one. It moves beyond product features and benefits to appeal to a customer's feelings, values, and aspirations. The goal is to foster loyalty so deep that the brand becomes a part of the consumer's identity.
The traditional Indian retail model was epitomised by the local kirana store. Here, the relationship was inherently personal. Store owners knew their customers by name and understood the needs of their families. Loyalty was forged through a human bond, and the product selection was a curated reflection of the local community. The store owners were the primary means of conveying product value to their customers.
The rise of television advertising in the late 20th century provided brands with a new, efficient medium to convey product value, offering more control over the message than they had through the human medium of kirana stores. The increased preference for TV promotion gave way to supermarkets as the preferred channel for both customers and brands. As they both gained value from their efficiency and scale. While this benefited consumers with lower prices and a wider selection, it came at the cost of the personal touch.
The consumer became an anonymous shopper, and loyalty was engineered through data-driven programs, creating a "relationship vacuum." The experience became transactional and impersonal. This 'relationship vacuum' prompted the first attempt to rebuild connection at scale: mass-market emotional branding. Unable to forge personal bonds, brands used one-to-many media like television to appeal to broad, universal emotions, such as Nike's "Just Do It" campaign, which sells a mindset and a lifestyle rather than just products or the loyalty depicted in Budweiser's 'Best Buds' campaign. Such campaigns gained popularity as a "Pull Marketing" strategy and have defined the marketing literature of the past few years. While this created an emotional pull for a wide audience, it was a broadcast, not a conversation. An imperfect patch that highlighted the growing need for a more genuine connection.
The internet moved the supermarket to our mobile phones, offering unparalleled convenience but also deepening the sense of depersonalization. E-commerce platforms presented an infinite shelf of products, but the brand-consumer relationship became even more abstract, mediated by search algorithms and star ratings. This model perfected transactional efficiency but often failed to build the lasting emotional bonds that create true loyalty, setting the stage for the next evolution.
The rise of the D2C microbrand marks a return to the ethos of the kirana store, reimagined for the digital age. This is an evolution from pull-based marketing to "connect-based" marketing.
Entrepreneurs identify a specific user segment, gain a deep understanding of its needs, and build a brand dedicated to serving that tribe. For example, Mokobara doesn't just sell luggage; it targets urban millennials and Gen Z who see travel as a core part of their lifestyle and identity. A traditional company would find this niche focus unsustainable. But for a microbrand, this focus is its greatest strength, made possible by digital marketing.
Digital platforms allow for a level of precision that was previously unimaginable. Brands can target consumers based on psychographics, purchasing behaviour, and online interests. This allows a microbrand to be supremely relevant to a narrow audience, rather than struggling to be vaguely relevant to a broad one. This technological capability is the engine of modern emotional branding, allowing brands to forge genuine connections with customers who feel their needs are finally being heard.
The "connect-based" model fundamentally changes the economics of brand building, particularly when it comes to two key metrics: Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Customer Lifetime Value (CLV).
Microbrands achieve a lower blended CAC by using hyper-targeting to reach a receptive niche audience with an emotionally resonant message. This results in higher conversion rates. More importantly, this model fosters a loyal community, akin to a cult, that generates powerful, low-cost marketing assets like authentic user-generated content (UGC) and word-of-mouth referrals. This reduces reliance on expensive paid ads over time. For instance, while a paid Instagram ad in India's D2C fashion sector might have a CAC of ₹800 - ₹1200, organic content marketing can bring that cost down to ₹300 - ₹600.
Simultaneously, emotional connection is the single most potent driver of CLV. Emotionally connected customers make more repeat purchases, are less price-sensitive, and become vocal advocates for the brand. As the famous Bain & Company study noted, a 5% increase in customer retention can increase profits by a staggering 25% to 95%.
Minimalist is a prime example of this model in action. The brand targeted a niche audience that values transparency and efficacy in skincare, rejecting marketing clutter. They built a superior product, clearly labelled it with its ingredients, and let the product's performance speak for itself.
Their strategy was to focus on product quality and a simple, efficient supply chain through online platforms. The result? A reported repeat purchase rate of 60% (three times the industry average) and a Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) of 4x (twice the industry average). They didn't just build a customer base; they cultivated a loyal following.
While the microbrand model is powerful, it is not without its challenges, especially when it comes to growth. The primary growth strategy often follows a "leader-follower" model. Microbrands first target a core group of highly involved, influential users who are part of their niche. These "leaders" then organically recommend the brand to a wider audience of "followers" who trust their judgment.
The critical challenge lies in scaling without alienating the original core audience. This creates two significant risks:
Segment Conflict: As a brand expands its product lines or messaging to appeal to a new segment, you may end up serving a segment incompatible with the values of your leaders. A single misstep can shatter the authentic connection they worked so hard to build.
Brand Identity Dilution: As the brand gains popularity, the followers grow. When this growth stagnates, which it inevitably will. Brands may feel pressured to appease the followers in order to sustain growth. Every growth decision, ranging from new product development to marketing campaigns, must be ruthlessly aligned with this core identity. The very act of becoming more mainstream can feel like a betrayal of the original "tribe".
What's difficult is that these conflicts and dilutions are very hard to detect in time. As the brand grows, an increasing number of followers from the original goodwill (a lag metric) can easily overshadow a decline or dissatisfaction within the smaller leader community (the brand ambassadors). As the leaders stop recommending the brand, the followers gradually shift to cheaper alternatives.
The rise of microbrands marks more than just a business trend; it represents a cultural return to human-centric commerce.
These brands are leveraging technology to restore something traditional marketing lost: trust, intimacy, and belonging. In doing so, they’ve proven that consumers today don’t just see value in products — they see value in experience and connection.
Yet, this model isn’t without its challenges. Growth can threaten the very intimacy that fuels success. As microbrands expand, they face what I call the “leader–follower dilemma”: scaling to reach new audiences without alienating the core believers who built their community.
Their success, then, depends on their ability to grow deeper, not just wider, and to preserve the authenticity that first earned their tribe’s trust.
If traditional brands are like floodlights - broad, bright, and all-encompassing, microbrands are laser pointers - focused, precise, and impossible to ignore.
As the HUL–Minimalist story unfolds, it raises a larger question for legacy corporations: Can giants learn to think small?
Because in an age where algorithms rule and attention is scarce, scale alone no longer guarantees connection. The future belongs to brands that remember what the kirana store once knew instinctively. At its heart, business is still a human relationship.
This is an updated version of my article initially published in the MBAEx Business Review.
You can find the original article here.